Burmese Americans are widely dispersed throughout America. Surprisingly, there is no single geographic region that is home to most Burmese Americans. Here’s a look at which states most Burmese Americans reside in.
For more on my series about Burmese Americans, click on the “Burmese Americans” tag.
Top 10 States for Burmese Americans
Surprisingly, Burmese Americans live in all 50 American states. California houses almost 18% of Burmese Americans, followed by New York (12.1%), Texas (10.4%), and Indiana (7.9%). Texas and Indiana are not surprising choices, as they are 2 major resettlement destinations for newly-arrived refugees. In fact, Texas is the number one refugee resettlement destination in the country.
In absolute numbers, Burmese Americans are largely concentrated in a handful of states. The top 10 states constitute 67.8% of the Burmese American population.
When taken as a percentage of each state’s Asian American population, Midwest states are overrepresented, with South Dakota leading the pack. Burmese Americans tend to be more densely represented in areas that traditionally have small Asian American communities. In fact, among the top 10, only Minnesota has an Asian American population above 4%.
However, Burmese Americans constitute no more than 0.123% of any state’s population.
A Detailed Breakdown
Rank | State | Burmese American Population | % of Burmese Americans |
---|---|---|---|
1 | California | 17,978 | 17.9% |
2 | New York | 12,174 | 12.1% |
3 | Texas | 10,451 | 10.4% |
4 | Indiana | 7,868 | 7.9% |
5 | North Carolina | 3,779 | 3.8% |
6 | Minnesota | 3,763 | 3.8% |
7 | Maryland | 3,450 | 3.4% |
8 | Illinois | 2,950 | 2.9% |
9 | Arizona | 2,675 | 2.7% |
10 | Georgia | 2,646 | 2.6% |
11 | Florida | 2,578 | 2.6% |
12 | Nebraska | 2,250 | 2.2% |
13 | Washington | 2,058 | 2.1% |
14 | Michigan | 1,856 | 1.9% |
15 | Colorado | 1,822 | 1.8% |
16 | Pennsylvania | 1,822 | 1.8% |
17 | Virginia | 1,668 | 1.7% |
18 | Kentucky | 1,524 | 1.5% |
19 | Ohio | 1,356 | 1.4% |
20 | Tennessee | 1,324 | 1.3% |
21 | Iowa | 1,260 | 1.3% |
22 | Kansas | 1,204 | 1.2% |
23 | New Jersey | 1,197 | 1.2% |
24 | Wisconsin | 1,197 | 1.2% |
25 | Oklahoma | 1,146 | 1.1% |
26 | Utah | 1,090 | 1.1% |
27 | Massachusetts | 1,072 | 1.1% |
28 | Oregon | 977 | 1.0% |
29 | Missouri | 842 | 0.8% |
30 | Connecticut | 763 | 0.8% |
31 | South Dakota | 669 | 0.7% |
32 | South Carolina | 425 | 0.4% |
33 | Idaho | 399 | 0.4% |
34 | Nevada | 349 | 0.3% |
35 | Hawaii | 281 | 0.3% |
36 | Louisiana | 270 | 0.3% |
37 | Alabama | 146 | 0.1% |
38 | District of Columbia | 134 | 0.1% |
39 | Vermont | 126 | 0.1% |
40 | West Virginia | 109 | 0.1% |
41 | Rhode Island | 108 | 0.1% |
42 | New Mexico | 89 | 0.1% |
43 | New Hampshire | 67 | 0.1% |
44 | Maine | 65 | 0.1% |
45 | Arkansas | 53 | 0.1% |
46 | Delaware | 51 | 0.1% |
47 | Mississippi | 37 | 0.0% |
48 | Alaska | 30 | 0.0% |
49 | North Dakota | 28 | 0.0% |
50 | Montana | 14 | 0.0% |
51 | Wyoming | 10 | 0.0% |
References
I obtained this data from the 2010 Census Summary File 2, PCT1-Population Group-Burmese alone or in any combination (404) & (100-299) or (300, A01-Z99) or (400-999): TOTAL POPULATION, sorted by State.
Great. Thanks for the research!
Thanks, Ko Lwin Moe! 🙂