fifty viss

A tale of two families: Wealth and poverty in Burma

July 12, 2007 · 6 Comments

Maha Wizaya Pagoda, Rangoon
Praying for a better life: At the Maha Wizaya Pagoda in Rangoon.

When I went to Burma in 2006, one of my father’s friend, who I’ll call U Myint Aung picked us up at the Rangoon airport, in a old Toyota saloon car. A short and stout man, he was very talkative. U Myint Aung works as a part-time taxi driver and gambles with the Thai stock market volume numbers daily (it’s sort of a fad in Burma, to guess the decimal values of Bangkok’s daily stock market volume in hopes of winning money). He has four children, three boys and a girl. Although he is a college friend of my father, graduating with a B.Sc. in Chemistry, he cannot find decent work with an foreign registration card (FRC). The family was living off of the dollars Myint Aung had earned in Singapore during the last three years, doing odd jobs like splitting durians before he was caught by the authorities with an overstayed visa, caned and deported back.

My family stayed in Rangoon for two days, before leaving to go to upper Burma. We exchanged money using black market rates with him and gave him thousands of dollars in cash to safely keep while we were traveling (because credit cards rarely work in the country, cash is all travelers bring). He was very friendly, taking us to my father’s hometown, Nyaunglaybin in Pegu Division and delivering traditional Burmese mohingha and one-no hkauk swe to our hotel room each day out of his kindness and taking us to Shwe Pazun Bakery. The last day, my parents decided to treat his family to some biryani at the Nilar Dan Pauk restaurant. Afterward, we told them to walk with us back to the hotel. Their kids had never been to a Western-style hotel (it was Traders), were astonished by the illuminated swimming pool. When we went to our hotel room to talk, my sister and I played with the kids, running around in the hallway outside our room. They were amazed by the flushing toilet, something they had not seen before. They flushed toilet paper down, astonished and slightly scared.

That was surprising. I don’t know if I was just ignorant, but I had never thought of the flushing toilet as a luxury–after all, in my world, it was a necessity. It was not like I didn’t know that squat-down toilets existed, for I had used several in the countryside. But to see the reaction of kids who were in elementary and middle school and had never been exposed to the toilet, it shocked me. I remember when we went to upper Burma, U Myint Aung’s wife Yin Yin offered to wash all of our clothes. The morning before my family was set to leave, I brought the laundry up eight flights of stairs to U Myint Aung’s flat at the his insistence, as he was driving us to the airport.

During our travels in Rangoon, U Myint Aung talked about how he didn’t really care whether Burma was democratic or whether the Burmese people had liberties. He wanted security; he wanted a stable job that provided sufficient income to feed his family. He wanted to shed his FRC, a ridiculous document that is given to Chinese and Indians who cannot prove that their forebears lived in Burma in the 1800s. And it’s true, there is no explicit promise that democracy will bring economic change. But the status quo seems to only exacerbate the problem.

When my family came back to Rangoon for the final four days, we were picked up at the airport by my mother’s childhood friend, Loke Mway (Hakka Chinese for ‘little sister’). She comes from what some would call ‘old money’; her family had been wealthy for several generations; her father owned the Nwa Ni Pastry Company, a national brand in the 1960s, and during nationalization, converted his factories to produce fine sugar for government bakeries. She drove us in a new silver Suzuki SUV, a rarity in the country. Currently, her family owned an amusement park in Rangoon and had invested in several enterprises. She took us to an international hotel to eat and later to the amusement park she and her husband owned. The rides of course, did not look entirely safe. Two days later, we visited Loke Mway, who lives in a five-story apartment in Bahan Township (rebuilt to suit the family’s needs). What an extravagant life, I thought. The family lived with three maids, each for one of their daughters.

The next morning, Loke Mway came with her family to talk and catch up at the hotel we were staying in. My sister and I proceeded to show her daughters, all attending an international school, the swimming pool. They were impressed and begged their mother for membership at the pool. I couldn’t believe it. What an amazing gap in wealth there is in Burma, even in urban Rangoon. The well-connected and rich live lives entirely oblivious to their surroundings. They are awash with so much money that it’s unbelievable. I had never met such spoiled children, even in America.

I remember that Loke Mway had successfully acquired a visa from the U.S. Embassy’s OP lottery program (before it became the DV lottery) and wrote to my mother asking if she would help her. My mother replied and said that if she wanted to come to the U.S., she would have to be willing to give up her life in Burma and accept that she would have to struggle and work from the bottom up. She decided not to come. It’s usually not worth it for rich Burmese people to come to the U.S., unless they have professional degrees (like medical doctors) for the simple fact that they will be giving up lives that are in many ways, better in Burma (aside from no political rights, but I think that’s scantly important among the upper classes there). For the poor and the middle classes, it’s a lot more fruitful to come to any industrialized country to work, because there is a complete guarantee that they will lead better lives there.

Unlike the few idealists who are committed to bringing democratic reform to Burma, for most Burmese, the most pressing issues are not concerned with political freedom or tyranny; they’re rooted in more basic problems, citizenship, employment, and the human desire to be secure. And for many, it’s even simpler than that: they merely want running water, some rice and housing. Democracy may help solve this, but the élite and military élite in particular will surely have trouble in changing their ways. It is going to take many decades to shake off the grip and enormous influence the élite have in the country. A democratic Burma may satisfy the West and the international community, but in the end, it may not satisfy the 50 million who live there.

All of the names have been changed for privacy reasons.

Categories: Burma · Democracy · Economy · Family · Travel

6 responses so far ↓

  • K // July 12, 2007 at 11:13 pm

    Yes…it’s sad but ture..

  • Sit Naing // July 15, 2007 at 11:45 pm

    “A democratic Burma may satisfy the West and the international community, but in the end, it may not satisfy the 50 million who live there.”

    I dont agree with your conclusion remark stated above. Burma was a prosperous nation
    before military thugs took over power 45 yrs ago. Because of mismanagement of economy by them, there is no social security for 50 million who live there. Democracy may help solve this. It is going to take long time, but at last we will achieve this under strong leader leader like ASSK.

  • Aung Kyaw // July 16, 2007 at 8:47 am

    I think it’s too much of a generalization to say that Burma was prosperous before Ne Win staged a coup d’état in 1962, because of much of the so-called prosperity came from Burma’s rice industry, but the country was largely unstable, with political factions splitting apart the government and separatist movements from ethnic minorities. I believe that democracy can help solve the problems that Burma faces, but it does not guarantee this. As in the case of China and Vietnam, which are not democracies, living standards have risen substantially, with strong leaderships that know how to govern. I think democracy is not always required in the equation to raise living standards.

  • Editor // July 17, 2007 at 5:22 pm

    Democracy is tricky to talk about because people can see it differently. Many people say ‘democracy’ and mean elections/representative government. In this sense, no, it won’t do much to fix anything. Accountability and participation is also key - America has a functioning democracy, but in the absense of accountability, it’s clear that many of our elected leaders have no qualms about not acting in the best interest of the people. But, democracy is also the best way to guarantee that the average person will be able to participate in their government, and it’s also the best way to ensure accountability.

    It’s never perfect because people are not perfect, but, the principle of democracy and all that goes with it - participation, rule of law, accountabilty, among others - is what is important. However, this does not require a strong leader, but a strong public. Democracy should not be about strong leaders. People who voted for him beleived Bush was a strong leader, and arguably, he’s the worst president we’ve ever had. Strong leadership may have accomplished an increase in the quality of life in Cambodia and Vietnam, but who knows how things might be different under different governments - and what about future leaders? Ethnic conflicts and discord is a big issue with Burma, democracy in itself may not solve those problems, but further authoritarian or centralized governments will definitely not solve it. Not addressing these problems will always stand in the way of Burma’s development. Democracy is an ongoing process, and establishing it is just a very first baby step towards a solution, not the solution in itself. It’s still important though.

  • Aung Kyaw // July 17, 2007 at 7:33 pm

    Yeah, I agree. I think that the best years of modern Burma were the U Nu years in the 1950s, during which parliamentary democracy flourished. Although far from perfect, those early years proved that democracy could work in a country as diverse as Burma is. But, I think that the direction Burma is heading, to a constitutional ‘democracy’, in name, is dangerous, because the outside world seems more focused on getting the MPs elected in 1990 (including NLD MPs) to participate in the Constitutional Convention and speeding up elections, than on seeing that the military is entrenching itself into the future government through the constitution.

  • Editor // July 17, 2007 at 8:23 pm

    Yes, I think that focus on elections has always been a problem. I think the US and other Western gov’ts are in large part responsible for pushing this perspective of Burma, as it is simple and easy to side with, but exempts them from having to get their hands dirty in actually trying to help. (Whether that’s diplomatic involvement or otherwise). It focuses on easy political issues and not on the dirty humanitarian issues like ethnic cleansing or civil conflict. Democracy has become such a loaded word, unfortunately, and plenty of people living in them fail to grasp what it really means.

    What I really wish is that we could reclaim what ‘democracy’ really means, and not have it be code for the euphamistic “American Values”. Both in US and international politics.

Leave a Comment